(Schiavo/PopeWatch 2k5: Mortality always wins)
Here at the Enfranchised, we read a lot. Just... not quickly. So, hitherwith, we introduce our review masthead: The Eventual Gander. That's not to say we'll review anything less than the pinnacle and forefront of pseudo-intellectual circles. As the saying goes: What's good for the prompt goose is good for the eventual gander.
Tom Wolfe's I Am Charlotte Simmons
When Ansel Adams passed away, he willed the negatives of all of his photographs as a tangible possession. Celebrity worship aside (in the current day and age a man of his stature could leave a receipt on a table after dinner and find it on eBay by dessert), he did this because he felt they had value. To him, taking a picture was composed of two equally important steps: first exposing the film to capture an image, and then turning this semi-Platonic abstraction into bona fide hangible art through the process of printing. Writing is like this too, and in I am Charlotte Simmons, Tom Wolfe has succeeded admirably at the first but managed to hide that fact beneath severe stumbling in the second.
Without appearing too pathetic, allow me to say that Wolfe is spot-on in many instances. Speaking of that opportunity to slip one's alma mater into conversation, he writes (of the fictional Dupont College), "Everyone, male or female, who was right now, as he was, in the undergraduate division, Dupont College, or had ever graduated from Dupont College knew that feeling, treasured that feeling, sought one way or another to enjoy that feeling daily if at all possible, now and for the rest of his life". If this sounds horribly pretentious and off-putting, well, it is. Which is why, he continues, "no Dupont man... had ever tried to describe it out loud to a living soul." He continues to observe the intermittent cycle of a freshman's life: from the heights of arrogance to the troughs of self -doubt and -pity. This, of course, while the self is trodding through a life of intellectual luxury on someone else's tab with no responsibilities to speak of. Trivial matters such as sides of the room, borrowings of discs compact, unfounded crushes are such stuff as life and death are made during a co-ed's career. Translate to the language of rap, this would best be put, "Mo' Education, Mo' Problems."
He has his other bones to pick, of course. One of the title heroine's suitors is the star of a basketball team. Wolfe has applied his expert eye to the NCAA, endorsement deals, groupies, just about every morsel of the Big Man On Campus Phenomenon. He dissects feelings of parental shame and familial denial. These are all spot on observation, etc. Thus ends the positive portion of my review, such as it is.
The imperfections, on the other hand, are many. And yet, somehow, the critics got them wrong. Many were shocked at the lurid and, quite frankly, unarousing descriptions of intimacy he includes. Wolfe took home an award for worst sex scene of the year. What the committee missed was that it was not the worst scene of sex. It was a great scene of the worst sex. He distorts his writing because that is how it is in the trenches of modern fraternity houses and two-room doubles. But he never lets up. His writing is awkward and the characters stiff throughout the whole novel, as if college is something to be experienced for all eight semesters through a lens of discomfort. The result approximates a really interesting person with bad breath: you force your way through to the end because you know you will enjoy having heard it, even if the experience itself is excruciating.
One of nine-thousand and seventy-three sayings attributed to Mark Twain is "Show, Don't Tell." Wolfe apparently decided to piss on the House of Clemens. Well, okay, you say. Sometimes you just don't have the space to do all that. But in a book that winds through 676 pages and weighs enough to take down a gazelle if the situation arises, you think he really could have pointed out that athletics is a golden ticket with more subtlety than "the sweet irony was that [basketball player extraordinaire but less-than-stellar-academician] had wound up at a better university than Eric [(the smarter but less-baller brother)]."
The bigger issue is that this is Tom Wolfe. At every turn, in every nook of prose and cranny of words, you can see the man in his white suit typing out this introduction to a new world. He shows off, dropping terms as if they were names. He clues in the reader to the lingo: "dormcest" is mentioned by an "RA" as a type of "hooking up". And yet the actual act is still "rutting", which is often preceded by simulation of the "mons veneris" and the "ilial crest". Thanks Tom. Just what I needed: a newly old man to turn his attention to my home to tell me how bad it is, all the while knowing that he really wants to be back there. To be where the culture is being made, where it is being blindly felt in the backseat of an Escalade on the way to a formal. Your criticism would mean a lot more if it weren't compensation for jealousy.
In the end, I am Charlotte Simmons should never be allowed in the fiction section of a bookstore. Instead, copies of it should be relegated to that part of a college bookstore next to a sweatshirt bearing the (trademarked) logo of these cathedrals of learning, money, and semi-anonymized semi-drunk semi-dancing semi-sex. That way, when Mom and Pop come to visit Junior and Juniess, all settled into their dorms, they can pick up a hat or fanny pack for expressing their pride in public, and a copy of I am Charlotte Simmons for abating their curiosity and empty nesting in private.
Sunday, April 03, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Hi, I was reading reviews for I am Charlotte Simmons and happened across yours. You've got an excellent observation and review of the book. (I may soon post a review of my own that I wrote of it some months back.)
I thought you got it right.
As good as it is sometimes or as bad as it is sometimes, it was a lot of fun to read.
Greg
Oh no....i'm a big fan of this author and just started a book club..and i suggested this book....now what? I'm finding it a much faster read than THE KITE RUNNER...which we all seemed to agree was interesting but heavy duty and inaccurate in parts
I graduated from college more than 10 years ago, but i felt that a lot of Tom's points were right on the money about the college social scene. On the other hand, all of the characters, including Charlotte, were pretty one-dimensional. Her metamorphasis from learned bumpkin with high moral standards to a run-of-the mill party girl seems contrived. Yeah, she'd always longed to fit in socially with the cool kids, and to be admired for her accomplishments; however, I could not help but feel that her transition from an intellectual to a skank needed greater detail/back story.
In response to the last comment about Charlotte turning into a "skank", I think you missed the point. The novel ends with Charlotte still wrestling with her soul, her conscience.
There is no suggestion in any way that she has totally abandoned her morals but rather that she is wrestling with them in what to her, is a brave new world.
As for the review in geenral, I also disagree - Wolfe accuratley lays out the culture and mores of today's youth, but he does not hold their elders guiltless. Rather, they have brought us to this point by suggesting the soul no longer exists, and here we are now faced with an entire generation that thrives on being accountable to no-one for their actions.
Don't blame Wolfe for delivering the facts. As for him being jealous...what a shallow, simplistic and totally inadequate response!
I'm at a British university and it is so funny to see the idiosyncrasies of an American one so perceptively portrayed. While we don't have the culture of underage drinking (namely because it is legal as long as you are not buying the drink or in a bar you can drink alcohol from the age of 5!) but we do, at the top universities, have the inverted snobbery, sense of entitlement and obsession with being worth more of less than our peers. It seems that across the globe, being told you are clever, witty, well read breeds a very unattractive set of people.
Wolf's character, Adam, emphasises this. A free thinker, or to use his words, a bad ass still has to survive in the empire that is the US. Even this boy who seems to be left leaning and intellectual focuses on the "aristo-meritocracy" a contradiction in terms. That is what all Wolfs characters end up being. A tough guy basketball god who thinks her’s gods gift but doesn't have the brains to attract the girl of his dreams. Adam, whose intellect is the only thing that defines him and yet is deftly destroyed by a beautiful girl’s confused and slightly indulgent responses to his world ideals. In fact Charlotte herself is a contradiction, believing herself to be better than anyone who has crossed her path, no mater how much attention she is given she seems unable to form sensible relationships.
This book does not seem to blame but to show the irony of this sense of entitlement and superiority. These kids are without exception, fucked up. You come away realising that maybe being average or unaware is easier. Maybe a self consciousness and an idea of yourself in relation to reality is a crucial part of being an intellectual. The world does not revolve around your GPA or in my case A-levels. Dupont, Duke or Oxford may be a ticket to an investment bank, but not to a fulfilled life.
Post a Comment