- no electronics
- no standing in the last hour of a flight
- only one carry-on bag
These make traveling a lot less attractive: over the past 20 years, a coast-to-coast trip has gotten less convenient. The trip now takes longer (airplanes haven't gotten faster, and I'm more constrained in what I can do).
I see 3 ways to return to the era of luxurious and sumptuous transcontinental travel:
1) Bring sanity to Airport Security. Yeah, this might happen. OK, next solution.
(Oh hey, it turns out that when a problem is hard to solve, it's easier to go around it)
2) Build faster planes. If flying New York to San Francisco took, say, 2 hours, then it's fine not to have your computer. But Concorde tried this, and, well, kind of failed.
3) Screw you, planes. Major airlines already operate a hub-and-spoke model. You know what else uses fixed routes? Trains. You know what have more room than planes? Trains. You know what are almost as fast as planes? Trains with Rockets.
Yes yes yes, trains are more fuel efficient than planes. Do Americans care about fuel efficiency? No. We care about convenience and awesome. Trains with Rockets have both. Heck, I'd even be fine with Trains with Jet engines. Yes, I know they'll never be as fast as planes. But you'll have more leg room. A red-eye will be doable. And you'll get to arrive/leave in city centers. C'mon Mr. President, this massive civil works project is one I can believe in.
1 comment:
Most train depots don't have great security. And they'd store rocket fuel? ... Then again, the plan doesn't need to be perfect. It just needs to be better than our current system. ... OK, I'm in.
Post a Comment